DOI: https://doi.org/10.32515/2414-3820.2023.53.186-196
Update of the Tractor Park of the Poltava Region, Analysis and Perspectives
About the Authors
Oleksandra Bilovod, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Poltava State Agrarian University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: oleksandra.bilovod@pdaa.edu.ua, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3470-0091
Viacheslav Padalka, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Poltava State Agrarian University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: viacheslav.padalka@pdau.edu.ua, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4135-3318
Oleksii Burlaka, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Poltava State Agrarian University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: oleksii.burlaka@pdau.edu.ua, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2296-7234
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to improve the organizational and technical mechanisms for updating the tractor fleet of enterprises and individuals of the Poltava region, taking into account modern trends and transformations of the region's economy, caused by the state of war.
The initial data for the study are the characteristics of purchased and registered tractors from 2018 to 2023, which are reflected in the single register for keeping automated records of tractors of the agricultural machinery registration department of the head office of the State Production and Consumer Service in Poltava region. We include the following characteristics among the investigated factors:
1. The year of registration of tractors in the unified register of automated accounting of tractors of the agricultural machinery registration department of the Main Department of the State Production and Consumer Service in Poltava region.
2. Entities registering tractor equipment are classified by groups: private individuals; farms, enterprises engaged in other economic activities.
In the Poltava region from 2018 to 2021, there is a clear tendency of the generalized trend towards a stable increase in the number of purchased equipment for all three selected research groups. The beginning of military events led to a sharp – more than twofold – reduction of purchased and registered tractors and tractor equipment.
The dynamics of the ratio of the use of foreign tractors and tractors of domestic production is no less a painful topic for Ukraine. In addition, the indicators of 2022 and 2023 have a negative trend towards a significant relative increase in the tractor market of the Poltava region of foreign-made tractors. The number of foreign tractor models in 2022 and most of 2023 exceeded the registration of domestically produced tractors by almost three times.
To improve this situation, machine-building enterprises are recommended to master new tractor-building technologies, taking into account the experience of the world's leading manufacturers.
Keywords
tractors, registration, analysis, dynamics, forecasting, update
Full Text:
PDF
References
1. Zakon Ukrajiny „Pro stymuljuvannja rozvytku vitčyznjanoho mašynobuduvannja dlja ahropromyslovoho kompleksu” vid 07.02.2002 r. # 3023 [Law of Ukraine "On stimulating the development of domestic engineering for the agro-industrial complex" dated February 7, 2002]. zakon4.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/šow/3023-14 [in Ukrainian].
2. Zakon Ukrajiny „Pro systemu inženerno-texničnoho zabezpečennja ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Ukrajiny” vid 05.10.2001 r. # 2658 [Law of Ukraine "On the system of engineering and technical support of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine" dated October 5, 2001 No. 2658]. zakon4.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/229-16 [in Ukrainian].
3. Beshun, O., Achkevych, V. & Chuba, S. (2018). Analysis of the development sectors of agricultural machinery agricultural machinery Pratsi Tavriiskoho Derzhavnoho Ahrotekhnolohichnoho Universytetu, 18 (2), 237–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.31388/2078-0877-18-2-237-246 [in English].
4. Duan, Y. P., Pan, H., Zhang, Y. & Li, T. H. (2014). Research on the Investment Management of Agricultural Machinery Based SPSS. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 687–691, 5177–5180. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.687-691.5177 [in English].
5. Wieliczko, B. (2015). Investment in machinery, equipment and means of transport in Polish agriculture, 2009–2012: example of FADN region 785 (Pomorze i Mazury). Studies in Agricultural Economics, 117 (1), 43–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.7896/j.1506 [in English].
6. Lisa, S., Perrine, T., Jacky, M. & James, O. (2013). Impacts of Fiscal Reforms on Country Attractiveness. Investment Claims. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/lawiic/9780199983025.016.0008 [in English].
7. Hadrich C., Larsen, J. & Olson, R. E. F. (2013). Impact of the Section 179 tax deduction on machinery investment. Agricultural Finance Review, 73 (3), 458–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2012-0035 [in English].
8. Myniv, R.M. (2019). Methodical approaches to the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 21 (93), 63–69. doi: http://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-e9313 [in English].
9. Vinichenko, I. & Shutko, T. (2019). The matrix model for assessing the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5 (3), 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-9-16 [in English].
10. Kolesnik, Y., Dobrovolska, O., Malyuta, I., Petrova, A. & Shulyak, S. (2019). The investment model of fixed assets renovation in the agricultural industry: case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16 (4), 229–239. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.20 [in English].
11. Akram, N., Akram, M. W., Hongshu, W. (2020). Study on the Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural Machinery. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11 (3). doi: http://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-3-07 [in English].
12. Naumenko, V.O., Naumenko, I.V. (2013). Otsinka suchasnoho stanu zabezpechenosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Kharkivskoi oblasti materialnotekhnichnymy resursamy [Assessment of the current state of provision of material and technical resources of agricultural enterprises of the Kharkiv region]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu im. V.V. Dokuchaieva. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchaeva Series: Economic Sciences, 6, 139–145. [in Ukrainian]
13. Hrytsyshyn, M., Perepelytsia, N. (2017). Rynok traktoriv v Ukraini. Propozytsiia. Suchasna tekhnika dlia suchasnoho ahrariia [The market of tractors in Ukraine. Offer: Special issue. Modern equipment for the modern farmer], 4–6. [in Ukrainian]
14. Kovtun, Ju.I. et al. (2020). Texnolohična bločno-variantna systema mašynovykorystannja v zemlerobstvi Ukrajiny [Technological block-variant system of machine use in agriculture of Ukraine]. Part. 1. Kh.: TOV Planeta-Prynt [in Ukrainian]
15. Luparenko, H.V. (2015). Stanovlennja traktorobuduvannja v Ukrajini [Development of tractor manufacturing in Ukraine: monograph]. Derž. Polites. muzej pry NTUU «KPI» ; Centr pamjatkoznavstva NAN Ukrajiny i UTOPIK. Nižyn : PP Lysenko M.M. [in Ukrainian].
16. Nakaz Ministerstva ahrarnoji polityky ta prodovolʹstva Ukrajiny #29 vid 22.01.2013 [Order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine No. 29 dated January 22, 2013]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0243-13#Text [in Ukrainian]
17. Gorb, Oleg et al. (2023). Strengthening Competitiveness of the National Economy by Inhancing Energy Efficiency and Diversifying Energy Supply Sources in Rural Areas. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], Vol. 11, 5, 1114-1123. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.5(45).09 [in English].
18. Burlaka, O. A., Jaxin, S. V., Padalka, V. V., & Burlaka, A. O. (2021). 100 ton za hodynu, a ščo dali? Porivnjujemo ta analizujemo xarakterystyky flahmansʹkyx modelej vysokoproduktyvnyx zernozbyralʹnyx kombajniv [100 tons per hour, what next? We compare and analyze the characteristics of flagship models of high-performance grain harvesters.]. Scientific Progress & Innovations, (3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2021.03.34 [in Ukrainian]
Citations
1. Закон України „Про стимулювання розвитку вітчизняного машинобудування для агропромислового комплексу” від 07.02.2002 р. № 3023. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3023–14 (дата звернення: 04.10.2023).
2. Закон України „Про систему інженерно-технічного забезпечення агропромислового комплексу України” від 05.10.2001 р. № 2658 URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/229–16.
3. Beshun O., Achkevych V., Chuba S. Analysis of the development sectors of agricultural machinery agricultural machinery. Pratsi Tavriiskoho Derzhavnoho Ahrotekhnolohichnoho Universytetu. 2018. 18 (2). 237–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.31388/2078-0877-18-2-237-246
4. Duan Y.P., Pan H., Zhang Y., Li T.H. Research on the Investment Management of Agricultural Machinery Based SPSS. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014. 687–691. 5177–5180. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.687-691.5177
5. Wieliczko B. Investment in machinery, equipment and means of transport in Polish agriculture, 2009–2012: example of FADN region 785 (Pomorze i Mazury). Studies in Agricultural Economics. 2015. 117 (1). 43–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.7896/j.1506
6. Lisa S., Perrine T., Jacky M., James O. Impacts of Fiscal Reforms on Country Attractiveness. Investment Claims. 2013. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/lawiic/9780199983025.016.0008
7. Hadrich C., Larsen, J., Olson, R. E. F. Impact of the Section 179 tax deduction on machinery investment. Agricultural Finance Review. 2013. 73 (3). 458–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2012-0035
8. Myniv R.M. Methodical approaches to the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. 2019. 21 (93). 63–69. doi: http://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-e9313
9. Vinichenko I., Shutko T. The matrix model for assessing the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2019. 5 (3). 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-9-16
10. Kolesnik Y., Dobrovolska O., Malyuta I., Petrova A., Shulyak S. The investment model of fixed assets renovation in the agricultural industry: case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 201). 16 (4). 229–239. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.20
11. Akram N., Akram M. W., Hongshu W. Study on the Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural Machinery. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2020. 11 (3). doi: http://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-3-07
12. Науменко В.О., Науменко І.В. Оцінка сучасного стану забезпеченості сільськогосподарських підприємств Харківської області матеріально-технічними ресурсами. Вісник Харківського національного аграрного університету ім. В.В. Докучаєва. Серія: Економічні науки. 2013. Вип. 6. С. 139–145.
13. Грицишин М., Перепелиця Н. Ринок тракторів в Україні . Пропозиція : Спецвипуск. Сучасна техніка для сучасного аграрія. 2017. С. 4–6.
14. Технологічна блочно-варіантна система машиновикористання в землеробстві України : монографія. Ч. 1. / Ю.І. Ковтун та ін. Х. : ТОВ Планета-Принт, 2020. 204 с.
15. Лупаренко Г.В. Становлення тракторобудування в Україні : монографія. Держ. Політехн. музей при НТУУ «КПІ» ; Центр пам’яткознавства НАН України і УТОПІК. Ніжин : ПП Лисенко М.М., 2015. 176 с.
16. Наказ Міністерства аграрної політики та продовольства України №29 від 22.01.2013. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0243-13#Text (дата звернення: 12.10.2023).
17. Gorb Oleg et al. Strengthening Competitiveness of the National Economy by Inhancing Energy Efficiency and Diversifying Energy Supply Sources in Rural Areas. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.]. 2020. Vol. 11, 5, 1114-1123, doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.5(45).09.
18. Бурлака О. А., Яхін С. В., Падалка В. В., Бурлака А. О. 100 тон за годину, а що далі? Порівнюємо та аналізуємо характеристики флагманських моделей високопродуктивних зернозбиральних комбайнів. Scientific Progress & Innovations. 2021. No 3. C. 274–288. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2021.03.34
Copyright (c) 2023 Oleksandra Bilovod, Viacheslav Padalka, Oleksii Burlaka
Update of the Tractor Park of the Poltava Region, Analysis and Perspectives
About the Authors
Oleksandra Bilovod, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Poltava State Agrarian University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: oleksandra.bilovod@pdaa.edu.ua, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3470-0091
Viacheslav Padalka, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Poltava State Agrarian University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: viacheslav.padalka@pdau.edu.ua, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4135-3318
Oleksii Burlaka, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Poltava State Agrarian University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: oleksii.burlaka@pdau.edu.ua, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2296-7234
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Zakon Ukrajiny „Pro stymuljuvannja rozvytku vitčyznjanoho mašynobuduvannja dlja ahropromyslovoho kompleksu” vid 07.02.2002 r. # 3023 [Law of Ukraine "On stimulating the development of domestic engineering for the agro-industrial complex" dated February 7, 2002]. zakon4.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/šow/3023-14 [in Ukrainian].
2. Zakon Ukrajiny „Pro systemu inženerno-texničnoho zabezpečennja ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Ukrajiny” vid 05.10.2001 r. # 2658 [Law of Ukraine "On the system of engineering and technical support of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine" dated October 5, 2001 No. 2658]. zakon4.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/229-16 [in Ukrainian].
3. Beshun, O., Achkevych, V. & Chuba, S. (2018). Analysis of the development sectors of agricultural machinery agricultural machinery Pratsi Tavriiskoho Derzhavnoho Ahrotekhnolohichnoho Universytetu, 18 (2), 237–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.31388/2078-0877-18-2-237-246 [in English].
4. Duan, Y. P., Pan, H., Zhang, Y. & Li, T. H. (2014). Research on the Investment Management of Agricultural Machinery Based SPSS. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 687–691, 5177–5180. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.687-691.5177 [in English].
5. Wieliczko, B. (2015). Investment in machinery, equipment and means of transport in Polish agriculture, 2009–2012: example of FADN region 785 (Pomorze i Mazury). Studies in Agricultural Economics, 117 (1), 43–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.7896/j.1506 [in English].
6. Lisa, S., Perrine, T., Jacky, M. & James, O. (2013). Impacts of Fiscal Reforms on Country Attractiveness. Investment Claims. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/lawiic/9780199983025.016.0008 [in English].
7. Hadrich C., Larsen, J. & Olson, R. E. F. (2013). Impact of the Section 179 tax deduction on machinery investment. Agricultural Finance Review, 73 (3), 458–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2012-0035 [in English].
8. Myniv, R.M. (2019). Methodical approaches to the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 21 (93), 63–69. doi: http://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-e9313 [in English].
9. Vinichenko, I. & Shutko, T. (2019). The matrix model for assessing the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5 (3), 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-9-16 [in English].
10. Kolesnik, Y., Dobrovolska, O., Malyuta, I., Petrova, A. & Shulyak, S. (2019). The investment model of fixed assets renovation in the agricultural industry: case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16 (4), 229–239. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.20 [in English].
11. Akram, N., Akram, M. W., Hongshu, W. (2020). Study on the Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural Machinery. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11 (3). doi: http://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-3-07 [in English].
12. Naumenko, V.O., Naumenko, I.V. (2013). Otsinka suchasnoho stanu zabezpechenosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Kharkivskoi oblasti materialnotekhnichnymy resursamy [Assessment of the current state of provision of material and technical resources of agricultural enterprises of the Kharkiv region]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu im. V.V. Dokuchaieva. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchaeva Series: Economic Sciences, 6, 139–145. [in Ukrainian]
13. Hrytsyshyn, M., Perepelytsia, N. (2017). Rynok traktoriv v Ukraini. Propozytsiia. Suchasna tekhnika dlia suchasnoho ahrariia [The market of tractors in Ukraine. Offer: Special issue. Modern equipment for the modern farmer], 4–6. [in Ukrainian]
14. Kovtun, Ju.I. et al. (2020). Texnolohična bločno-variantna systema mašynovykorystannja v zemlerobstvi Ukrajiny [Technological block-variant system of machine use in agriculture of Ukraine]. Part. 1. Kh.: TOV Planeta-Prynt [in Ukrainian]
15. Luparenko, H.V. (2015). Stanovlennja traktorobuduvannja v Ukrajini [Development of tractor manufacturing in Ukraine: monograph]. Derž. Polites. muzej pry NTUU «KPI» ; Centr pamjatkoznavstva NAN Ukrajiny i UTOPIK. Nižyn : PP Lysenko M.M. [in Ukrainian].
16. Nakaz Ministerstva ahrarnoji polityky ta prodovolʹstva Ukrajiny #29 vid 22.01.2013 [Order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine No. 29 dated January 22, 2013]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0243-13#Text [in Ukrainian]
17. Gorb, Oleg et al. (2023). Strengthening Competitiveness of the National Economy by Inhancing Energy Efficiency and Diversifying Energy Supply Sources in Rural Areas. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.], Vol. 11, 5, 1114-1123. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.5(45).09 [in English].
18. Burlaka, O. A., Jaxin, S. V., Padalka, V. V., & Burlaka, A. O. (2021). 100 ton za hodynu, a ščo dali? Porivnjujemo ta analizujemo xarakterystyky flahmansʹkyx modelej vysokoproduktyvnyx zernozbyralʹnyx kombajniv [100 tons per hour, what next? We compare and analyze the characteristics of flagship models of high-performance grain harvesters.]. Scientific Progress & Innovations, (3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2021.03.34 [in Ukrainian]
Citations
1. Закон України „Про стимулювання розвитку вітчизняного машинобудування для агропромислового комплексу” від 07.02.2002 р. № 3023. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3023–14 (дата звернення: 04.10.2023).
2. Закон України „Про систему інженерно-технічного забезпечення агропромислового комплексу України” від 05.10.2001 р. № 2658 URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/229–16.
3. Beshun O., Achkevych V., Chuba S. Analysis of the development sectors of agricultural machinery agricultural machinery. Pratsi Tavriiskoho Derzhavnoho Ahrotekhnolohichnoho Universytetu. 2018. 18 (2). 237–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.31388/2078-0877-18-2-237-246
4. Duan Y.P., Pan H., Zhang Y., Li T.H. Research on the Investment Management of Agricultural Machinery Based SPSS. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014. 687–691. 5177–5180. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.687-691.5177
5. Wieliczko B. Investment in machinery, equipment and means of transport in Polish agriculture, 2009–2012: example of FADN region 785 (Pomorze i Mazury). Studies in Agricultural Economics. 2015. 117 (1). 43–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.7896/j.1506
6. Lisa S., Perrine T., Jacky M., James O. Impacts of Fiscal Reforms on Country Attractiveness. Investment Claims. 2013. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/lawiic/9780199983025.016.0008
7. Hadrich C., Larsen, J., Olson, R. E. F. Impact of the Section 179 tax deduction on machinery investment. Agricultural Finance Review. 2013. 73 (3). 458–468. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/afr-07-2012-0035
8. Myniv R.M. Methodical approaches to the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. 2019. 21 (93). 63–69. doi: http://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-e9313
9. Vinichenko I., Shutko T. The matrix model for assessing the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2019. 5 (3). 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-9-16
10. Kolesnik Y., Dobrovolska O., Malyuta I., Petrova A., Shulyak S. The investment model of fixed assets renovation in the agricultural industry: case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 201). 16 (4). 229–239. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.20
11. Akram N., Akram M. W., Hongshu W. Study on the Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Adoption of Agricultural Machinery. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2020. 11 (3). doi: http://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-3-07
12. Науменко В.О., Науменко І.В. Оцінка сучасного стану забезпеченості сільськогосподарських підприємств Харківської області матеріально-технічними ресурсами. Вісник Харківського національного аграрного університету ім. В.В. Докучаєва. Серія: Економічні науки. 2013. Вип. 6. С. 139–145.
13. Грицишин М., Перепелиця Н. Ринок тракторів в Україні . Пропозиція : Спецвипуск. Сучасна техніка для сучасного аграрія. 2017. С. 4–6.
14. Технологічна блочно-варіантна система машиновикористання в землеробстві України : монографія. Ч. 1. / Ю.І. Ковтун та ін. Х. : ТОВ Планета-Принт, 2020. 204 с.
15. Лупаренко Г.В. Становлення тракторобудування в Україні : монографія. Держ. Політехн. музей при НТУУ «КПІ» ; Центр пам’яткознавства НАН України і УТОПІК. Ніжин : ПП Лисенко М.М., 2015. 176 с.
16. Наказ Міністерства аграрної політики та продовольства України №29 від 22.01.2013. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0243-13#Text (дата звернення: 12.10.2023).
17. Gorb Oleg et al. Strengthening Competitiveness of the National Economy by Inhancing Energy Efficiency and Diversifying Energy Supply Sources in Rural Areas. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, [S.l.]. 2020. Vol. 11, 5, 1114-1123, doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.5(45).09.
18. Бурлака О. А., Яхін С. В., Падалка В. В., Бурлака А. О. 100 тон за годину, а що далі? Порівнюємо та аналізуємо характеристики флагманських моделей високопродуктивних зернозбиральних комбайнів. Scientific Progress & Innovations. 2021. No 3. C. 274–288. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2021.03.34